| Proud to be a child of God, a faithful son (I hope lol) a trying to be hardworking student, a part-time worker, a nerf/milsim enthusiast, a crafting and music lover and an awesome friend. to you :) Hope you have an enjoyable time reading about my life, as much as I have fun living it! | MinimalistI am a university student who loves chocolate! Coffee is my best buddy when it comes to taking on my finals. I have a tendency to want to try and do so many different things at once and as a result, I've found my hobbies to be as such!   Nerfing is one of them, but aside from that, I also love arts and craft. I have my own startup, Thumbforlego at: where I sell my works!   I love to do all sorts of crafting, so you will see me uploading posts of my leathercrafts, thumbdrives, replica guns, nerf gun modifications and gundam models! I'm fortunate enough to be blessed by really supportive parents and given the chance to explore many, many parts of the world and try out a plethora of activities. This is also how I discovered my love for film photography, videography and piano.   The film photo above is unedited! My family loves cold countries xD. We managed to catch the northern lights twice!     I've also gotten the chance to experience many of nature's wonders   And my most freezing experience to date: riding a husky ski sled into the sunset (It was -38 to -40 degrees celsius and the huskies were pretty fast.)   Leave a message after the tone Why 36000feetabove? This is the altitude that commercial planes cruise at and I have always loved the view up in the sky, being amongst the sea of clouds. :) Personally, my favourite favourite food has got to be airplane buns! Does anyone else feel the same way?! With a slice of butter and looking out of the window, I have yet to find an experience that can beat that.   After tomorrow, before today
Recent posts: 
 Monthly 411: 
 Wednesday, April 06, 2011 ==================================================================== Article from Temasek Review ==================================================================== A Handbag and a Pack of Wolves March 31st, 2011 |  Author: Contributions  The attacks on Tin Pei Ling are of course unwarranted, especially those directed at her personal life. But before we go being all self-righteous and condemn these attacks, lets pause. The attacks are just simply what people have learned, really. For the longest time, it is Tin Pei Ling’s party – and one old man in particular – which had been merciless in tearing the skin off its opponents. Some had their lives utterly destroyed – such as Chia Thye Poh. Over the last two decades or so, vicious and crippling defamation suits were launched and won against its opponents, again crippling and incapacitating these. So, here now is Tin Pei Ling. In a cyber world age, she as a public figure now, has been stripped naked. Every inch of her is being inspected with a fine tooth comb. The pack is out for the hunt and they are looking for blood. And in some ways, they have found it. Some are beginning to find this sort of behaviour distasteful and are publicly condemning it and distancing themselves from it. I find this rather strange, to be honest. Were we expecting that there would not be such behaviour – at this first truly Internet election? Are we who are in Singapore so deep within our own well that we are surprised by this sort of behaviour? In the words of one old man, grow up. If you teach a people how to behave, and coerce them, frighten them and show them examples of what would happen if they do not behave as told, then you must accept that this people would learn your ways. And this is what is happening with Tin Pei Ling – the people have learned from the PAP. And yes, it is distasteful. It is unwarranted. But to lay the blame on the people alone is just plain missing the point, isn’t it? But of course some of us ask for higher ideals, a more “mature” set of behaviours. And some of us will behave such – mature, rational, etc. But to expect that everyone will do the same would be to expect a fairytale world. While I disagree with the behaviour of some in their attacks on Tin Pei Ling, I do – at the same time – feel that the bigger point is this: This saga shows that we need to put a stop to a Govt which runs such a system which today has resulted in a pack of wolves going so mercilessly after a young woman. This pack of wolves have learnt from their master. You may shoot the wolves – but really, it is the master which is calling the shots and setting the example. As long as the PAP is in power and continues to be in power, Singaporeans will always behave in the lowest, most base manner. After all, isn’t that how the PAP itself behaves? Why then do we expect others to be any different? Some say this is not how they want Singapore politics to be. Too bad, I’d say. It is how it is and it will continue to be how it is – until those leaders at the top set a new example, a new humaneness. It is easy to feel sorry for a young woman under attack. But do spare a thought for at least one other who spent 32 years behind bars for no other reason than that he disagreed with one other old man. One cruel deed begets another. And the old man and his cronies have committed many. But as for Tin Pei Ling, and those of you who feel sorry for her, perhaps you can take comfort in how all this will pan out – described so succintly by Martyn See: “I think it is okay to make fun of Tin Pei Ling. If we are a properly functioning democracy, she would’ve been torn asunder by comedians and caricaturists. But alas, we are not. In the end, she will stroll into her MP office, with make-up and handbags intact, and she’ll look back on this week as being the most trying period of her political career, and then she’ll have the last laugh, at your expense.” And, my friends, there is not a damn thing you can do about this. This is how perverted the system has become – where the fluff rises to the highest places. And perhaps this also explains the vitriolic attacks on Tin Pei Ling. If you still don’t understand, your well must be pretty deep. Anyways, Tin Pei Ling will be getting S$15,000 of taxpayers’ money a month. That is almost S$1 million for her 5-year term. Not bad – for someone who probably will not need to go through an election, hanging as she would onto the coattails of someone more senior. Yeah, she will be having the last laugh – handbag and all. So, chill. . OneSingaporean * OneSingaporean blogs at http://onesingaporean.wordpress.com/ ==================================================================== End of article ==================================================================== RE: A Handbag and a Pack of Wolves If only the Singapore parliamentary debates can be similar to that of the United Kingdom. So heated, so lively! Its blindingly obvious that the general elections are going to be in the month of May and the PAP has been revealing some new faces. one such candidate who is creating a really big buzz, is 27 year old, Tin Pei Ling. Creating a big buzz as she is a really young candidate to be fielded in a single member constituency as well as because of the lavish lifestyle she leads. Then the question arises. Should we access a candidate based on his/her personal life?  Frankly speaking before i move on into my justification, i dont see the point in bringing in the idea of the destroying of the lives of others who are against the "one old man in particular" as mentioned in the article above. Face it, this IS politics and the very idea of tearing down your opponents is the reason of ensuring your survival in the political realm in any country. PAP has tremendous power similar to a monopoly in the ruling of Singapore, thats a fact--for now. Whether it will change in the future, its all up to the ability of the opposition parties. The opposition seem to have a better line-up this elections! lets see if it translates to the gaining of more power.  People think that Tin Pei Ling is too young to be a candidate. Then as such, may i pose the question, why is it so that she can be chosen to run for a SMC? why is it so that out of so many members in the PAP, she is chosen by the prime minister to run in a SMC and not in a GRC? My answer to that, her capability. To be able to prove to be better than the rest (of which the majority is older) and garner the much needed trust by the PM that she is able to lead is a feat. Whether its a mistake that she got chosen, there is no point arguing over that. Its either a yes or a no. It will make the argument sound really stupid if people are just going to argue, "oh thats a mistake!", "no it isnt!", "yes it is!", "no it isnt!", "yes it is!". Rather, look at what she has done so far.  Moreover, some claim that she got the position by "backdoor means". i STRONGLY do not believe in this excuse as primarily, it is detrimental to the integrity of the Prime Minister. So obviously he won't be placing her in the SMC if she got through. How about a place in a GRC instead.. Even if thats the case, assuming she got in the SMC by such underhand methods, doesn't this also goes to show her ability to effectively walk up the political ladder rather than work up the ladder? so hey! We do have a really smart candidate who really knows how to negotiate! And what do politicians need to be good in? Negotiating! Look on the brighter side, our education has indeed proven to be so successful in terms of equipping teenagers with such good analytical skills! on a serious note, her success is also partially because of the quality of the education that she was provided with, henceforth propelling her so far front. I wont be surprised if more of such young candidates start popping up in the future~ A politician needs to come up with a concrete plan and her idea to break forth into the internet proves to be beneficial to the political realm as a whole. It is a win-win situation. She gets to reach out to the masses, people also do have the avenue to freely voice their concerns (not EXACTLY FREELY but oh well, its singapore.) and as such critically analyse who really is the best candidate.  Thats my take on the current situation. Back to the question,  Should we access a candidate based on his/her personal life?  Here's my stand on the issue. We should not base a candidate on his/her personal life. Its super short because i wanna sleep already! When it comes down to politics, what people want is the person who knows whats best for the people. Just how competent is the particular politician? (veering off topic) In my point of view, the competency of a person is not based on his age. Yes, age plays a role in the sense whereby older people tend to have more experience. However, in the case of Mrs Tin, what you have is the youthfulness in exchange of experience. Moreover, experience can be built up and ironically, this experience is harnessed as the politician works on the ground. Extrapolate that to a few years down the road and compare it with other incumbent MPs.Take minister Matthias Yao for example. He is 57 years old and has announced that he is stepping down as MP for Macpherson SMC. When Mrs Tin reaches that age, imagine the years of valuable experience she would have, it will overtake Matthias Yao.  A politician is seen as one of the leaders in the country, a public figure. As such, people conceive the idea that politicians like Mrs Tin should not be living a lavish lifestyle. Seriously, i think that is bs. It is of fundamental human rights that every single person has the right to choose on how exactly does he want to live his life. Moreover, i do not see how does the a lavish lifestyle impede the politician in anyway. Even if the lifestyle that the politician is living in proves to have a negative impact on the decisions that the politicians make, the politician still has every right to lead his way of life. Thats freedom of choice for you. However, if the candidate has been proven guilty that he has broken the law, then yes go ahead, punish him accordingly. Strip him off his leadership position.  Oops im feeling tired. Imma stop here! argh! oh might as well just end it off. Only time will tell. She has proven to the PM that she is capable. Now is the time for her to prove to the people that she is able to withstand criticisms from the public and build on the people's trusts. I do have faith in her that she can succeed :) not that im biased towards the PAP, but rather based on her abilities and feasible yet sustainable ideas, i think she would be accepted by the people--hopefully. lololol. anyway, who in the world likes to step out of his comfort zone eh? people are usually resistant to change and this is surely one huge change :)  Time will tell. Labels: newspaper article reply | 

